From source code to live services
We combine SAST code analysis with DAST testing of live services. Real attacks verify intrusion risks and gaps in authentication and access controls.
AI understands your web services and APIs, explores entry points from an attacker’s perspective, and validates vulnerabilities with real requests. Connect discovery to remediation and retesting.
Map services and APIs, then define what to validate.
Plan checks, analyze findings, and assign the next tasks.
Explore and validate, then return findings to the Planner.
Analyze findings · Repeat validation
The Planner identifies follow-up checks from the findings. The Worker repeats exploration and validation.
QueryPie AI tests your service from an attacker’s perspective. Security-focused AI verifies vulnerabilities, with data protection and clear reporting throughout.
We combine SAST code analysis with DAST testing of live services. Real attacks verify intrusion risks and gaps in authentication and access controls.
We connect clues across multiple attack steps to see how individual weaknesses could lead to real damage.
Testing follows the scope and execution rules agreed with you. Dangerous commands, such as data deletion, are blocked to protect your service and data.
AI runs in our own data center without sending data to external AI services. Collected data and materials are disposed of after the engagement.
Our QLM model and specialized security agents work together to find vulnerabilities, reproduce issues, and verify real risks.
Share a URL or IP address and arrange the required access. QueryPie handles testing and delivers a report with evidence and recommended fixes.
Detailed findings cover impact, reproduction steps, evidence, and fixes. Results are tailored to your reporting needs and formats so your team can put them straight to use.
Review risk levels and affected assets and APIs. Reproduction steps, PoCs, and actual requests and responses let your team verify each issue.
Verified evidence explains why each vulnerability occurred, with specific fixes and criteria for checking the results.
Get executive risk summaries, testing and remediation records for audits, and periodic security updates, tailored to your internal templates and required fields.
| Severity | Finding / affected asset | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Medium | Access token reuse after logoutPOST /auth/logout | In progress |
| Critical | Command injection in file conversionPOST /api/v1/documents/convert | Verified |
| High | Cross-tenant invoice downloadGET /api/v1/invoices/{id}/download | Pending |
| Low | Server version exposed in response headersGET /portal | Verified |
| Critical | SQL injection in admin user searchGET /api/admin/users | In progress |
| High | Unauthenticated document access via MCP/preset/customer-success/mcp | Pending |
A blocked request did not end the investigation. By persistently testing alternative request paths, the AI found a way to reach restricted internal management functions.
Rules prevented external access to internal management functions. Ordinary requests were blocked as intended.
Testing continued with different request paths. A mismatch between the blocking rules and the server’s path interpretation revealed a way through.
The bypass and supporting evidence were promptly shared with the team. Internal API authentication and access-blocking rules were strengthened.
Verify your exposure before an attacker does
Tell us about the services you want to test and the security challenges you face.